Answers to questions posed by the ADVISOR Users are now available online and will be updated regularly. Whether searching for a technical answer to a current problem, tips on how to perform a specific function or tricks to minimize effort needed to carry out a task, check out BNH’s responses below. If you cannot find what you are looking for, then email your question to email@example.com:
By deleting instructional goals within the module. The Instructional Goals within a module can be viewed by clicking on the Instructional Goals within Module folder under each module. To delete, click on the Instructional Goals folder, place checkmarks next to Instructional Goals you wish to delete and click Save.
By increasing the length of the instructional goals within the module. The Instructional Goals within a module can be viewed by clicking on the Instructional Goals within Module folder under each module. To modify the length of a module, click on the instructional goal under the Instructional Goals folder, modify the Length field and click Save.
Yes. Coaching and mentoring is equivalent to Instructor-led (On-location) with a student to instructor ratio of 1 to 1.
The Instructor with Computers delivery option implies a computer lab. It does not necessarily mean that instructor and students computers can interact with each other.
The Instructional Design Factors as well as Requirements under the Feasibility Analysis folder are primarily used to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of using alternate options for the delivery of training. Some of the data is critical, for example “Access to Computers”. If trainees have no access to computers, then all delivery options that require computers (including synchronous and asynchronous delivery options) are eliminated – i.e., assigned a 0% rating. In some cases a combination of factors may lead to the elimination of delivery options. For example, “Web Based Training” and “Internet Virtual Classroom” are eliminated if the “Internet Connection Speed is 56,000” and “Full Motion Video is Required”.
In other cases, the data is not critical. In this case, ADVISOR assigns values based on the ability of the delivery media in meeting this requirement – for example, 2 = fully meet, 1 = partially meet and 0 = does not meet. The rating of each delivery option is computed by determining the % of requirements met by each delivery option. For example, if 10 requirements are specified and a media fully or partially meets 9 with a score of 16, then the rating is 80% (=16/20).
Moreover, the reasons for the rating are provided- by clicking on the delivery option title under the Rating node under the Feasibility Analysis folder. These indicate the requirements that the media did not fully meet.
Once the effectiveness of various delivery options is determined the life cycle costs of plausible delivery options are computed – including design, development, delivery, administrative, management, maintenance and support.
The final recommendation is based on the Cost Effectiveness Rating of various delivery options – computed by dividing the effectiveness rating by the cost. In other words, options that provide the highest effectiveness (meet most requirements) at lowest cost.
If Y axis is your Feasibility and X axis is your cost, ideally, you are looking for a solution that is highly effective (approaches 100%) and cost the least (approaches $0). Since it is unlikely that we will get this solution, we prorate the media with the highest effectiveness to cost rating to 100% and the other media accordingly.
This ratio is the slope of the line (Feasibility / Cost) which indicates Productivity or Efficiency (Output / Cost). So in these terms, the ratios indicate the relative Efficiency of the media.
It implies that the delivery method has a zero rating under Feasibility Analysis.
If the Development Hours per hour field is unlocked, then the data is automatically undated from the Rating node under Feasibility Analysis folder. In other words, as the Requirements under Feasibility Analysis change, the Development Time is updated accordingly based on industry averages, and the Development Hours per hour field under the Development node under the Cost Analysis folder is updated accordingly. If you prefer to keep the Development Hours per hour fixed, then the field should be locked.
There is no need for Development Time Analysis in this case. It is either or. Development Time Analysis is only required if you do not how much effort is needed to develop the course – or want to compare to industry averages.
Since Technical Capability only impacts the effort needed to develop the course, there is no need for it in this case. It is either or. Technical Capability is only required if you do not how much effort is needed to develop the course. If you are not planning to use the Technical Capability – it is best to hide it under the Analysis Required tab under the Training Division node.
It refers to the effort needed to develop the CBT or WBT courseware to run on different types of equipment that the target audience might have. For example, if you are in charge of a media lab, we could specify the equipment in that lab and design the software for it, resulting in a rating of HIGH – no additional ‘programming’ effort is required.
Although at first glance the number of trainees for asynchronous delivery options may appear to be irrelevant, keep in mind that this number is used to compute the “frequency” of the course. Since the effort and in-turn the costs needed to administer, manage and support training is based on the number of days per class (i.e., frequency), the number of trainees per class is therefore important in computing the frequency and in-turn administrative, management and support costs.
Two examples are provided below to illustrate how the number of Instructors per class for asynchronous delivery options can be computed:
Example #1: If a class of 20 students will be taking WBT off-site and a single instructor is expected to answer e-mail questions and grade assignments submitted via the internet, then the number of instructors per class is 1.
Example #2: If a class of 45 students will be taking WBT off-site that is completely self contained with feedback and remediation and the test scores will be sent directly to the Training Management System, meaning that there is no direct instructor involvement, then the number of instructors per class is 0.
Three examples are provided below to illustrate how the % of Instructors that Travel can be computed:
Example #1: An instructor teaches 10 classes of a course in a year. One of these classes is off-site. Therefore, 10% of the instructor’s classes involve travel.
Example #2: A 36-week course has 2 classes each year with a different instructor for each class. One of the instructors is a contractor and must travel from home to the training center, a reimbursable expense. Therefore, 50% of the instructors travel.
Example #3: A class has 10 sessions. Two of these sessions are off-site. Therefore, 20% of the instructors travel.
Self-paced instruction encourages the trainee to take the most efficient path to content mastery, skipping areas of strength while focusing on areas of weakness. Interaction and immediate feedback provide constant, highly effective reinforcement of concepts and content. Personalized instructions accommodate different learning styles to maximize trainees learning efficiency. The reduction in training time is supported by the following references.
Bahlis, J. and Corneau, Daniel (1994), Case Study: Development and Implementation of Interactive Self-Study Training Program at National Defence
Headquarters, Directorate of Civilian Training and Development, paper presented at the Washington Interactive Multimedia 94 Conference, Washington, D.C.
Bunderson, C.V., and Olsen, J.B. (1984), Instructional Effectiveness of an Intelligent Videodisc in Biology, Machine Mediated Learning.
Ketner, W. (1982), “Videodisc Interactive Two-Dimensional Training”, paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference on Videodisk Training System, Warrengton, Virginia.
Kimberlin, D.A. (1982), The U.S. Army Air Defense School Distributed Instructional System Project Evaluation, paper presented at the 4th Annual Conference on Videodisk Learning System, Warrington, Virginia.
Miller, Rockley L. (1990), Learning Benefits of Interactive Technologies, the Videodisk Monitor, pages 15-17.
Reeves Thomas (1988), Effective Dimensions of Interactive Videodisk for Training”, Computer Assisted Approaches for Training, Elsevier Science Publishers, pages 119-132.
Reeves, Thomas and Marlino, Mary (1989), An Evaluation of the Emergency Medical Condition Interactive Videodisk”, American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
Weinstein, Stuart (1987), Training and Cost Effectiveness of Interactive Videodisks for Technical and Maintenance Training”, Research Report, SWL Inc., Multimedia Products Group, Vienna, Virginia.
Wright, Elizabeth (1983), Aid to Families with Dependent Children”, University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida.
Gained productivity that may result from compressing training time is accounted for under the Trainees Cost – Salary and Trainees Cost – Lost Opportunity fields under the Trainees node under the Cost Analysis folder.
Based on Trainees Annual Salary, ADVISOR computes the cost of time spent in training. If CBT requires 50% less time then instructor-led, for example, then Trainees Cost – Salary for CBT will be 50% less then instructor-led.
Each cost field within ADVISOR has an indicator [D] or [I] that specifies whether the cost is direct or indirect. If the cost is set to Indirect, then the time [person-days] needed to develop the content is presented under the Resources tab under the Summary node. To display the actual dollar amount under the Up-Front tab, change the indicator for the Avg. Daily Cost for Developer field under the Development node to [D] (by clicking on it).
1. Create 3 Development Costs Templates to reflect the 3 options that you wish to compare, namely “Own Development Costs”, “Industry Standard” and “Competitors Development Costs”.
2. Create a Course under Course Analysis and set-up required parameters including Trainees per Year and Instructional Goals.
Depending on how you want to view the data, you may either:
* Create two additional copies of the course
* Rename copied courses to reflect the different development models
* Import relevant Development Costs from Templates using Import Module Template
* View results of each course under Summary under Cost Analysis folder
* Generate a side by side comparison of the three options using Compare Training Budgets/Resources report under the Generate Reports folder
* Import relevant Development Costs from 1st Template (own development costs, for example) using Import Module Template
* View results of each course under Summary under Cost Analysis folder
* Generate Report using Course or Executive Report function
* Import relevant Development Costs from 2nd Template (Industry Standard, for example) using Import Module Template and repeat procedure.
Instructor Costs are directly related to the “length” of the course and instructor preparation time – in other words, the more time needed by the instructor – the higher the costs.
Administrative, Management and Support Costs are not necessarily related to the “length” of the course – but the “frequency” of the course – since it may take the same amount of time (effort) to book room, register trainees, arrange equipment, etc., for a 20 hour course or a 10 hour course. For this reason, Administrative, Management and Support Cost Templates capture the cost per class versus hour.
If new computers, equipment or software licenses are needed for the delivery of training – then Hardware Costs can be significant and should be considered. If the other hand, trainees are using their desktop computers – then its allocation to training is minimal.
Attrition Rate is the % of trainees that are not expected to complete the course on the 1st trial. Attrition rate can greatly impact costs, since it implies that more individuals would have to be trained or retrained in order to successfully train (graduate) the required number of individuals.
Let us assume that our objective is to successfully train 225 individuals. If the attrition rate is 0%, it implies that all trainees will successfully complete the course on the first trial. In this case, 225 individuals will require training to meet our objective. If, on the other hand, the attrition rate is 10%, it implies that 10% of the trainees are expected to dropout or fail the course on the first trial. In this case, 250 (= 225 / 0.9) individuals would have to be enrolled in the course in order to meet our goal – (i.e., successfully train 225 individuals.
Break Even Point is the point in time (or dollar amount) in which the initial investment has been recovered and savings commence. The Break Even Point between two delivery options is computed as follows:
Net Up-front Cost:
Upfront Cost of Delivery Option #1 – Upfront Cost of Delivery Option #2
Net Recurring Cost:
Recurring Cost of Delivery Option #1 – Recurring Cost of Delivery Option #2
# of months needed to break even:
[Net Up-front Costs / Net Recurring Costs] x 12
Dollars needed to break even:
Upfront Cost of Delivery Option #1 + Recurring Cost of Delivery Option #1 x (Break Even Point Months/12)
Up-Front costs also referred to as Start-up costs =
Hardware Costs + Development Costs
Recurring Costs per year =
Administrative Costs + Management Costs + Trainees Costs + Instructors Costs + Facilities Costs + Transmission Costs + Maintenance Costs + Support Costs
When dealing with multiple Target Audiences for a course, you can specify how the data is combined in the Criterion for Combining Data field under the Course Title node. If the Criterion is set to the Lowest Common Denominator, then the lowest salary and fringe benefits factor is used. You may select Average Value to verify if the salary and fringe benefits are reasonable. If not, the data in the Target Audience Templates could be wrong.
To reload the Target Audience Data, you will need to deselect or select at least one target audience and click Save.
Since Fringe Benefits Factor is a % of the salary, it will have no impact on the costs.
There is no simple (undo) procedure. Click on the Instructional Goals folder, place checkmarks next to instructional goals you wish to delete and click the Delete button. Another alternative is to delete the entire course. This may be appropriate if not much data has been populated within the course.
ADVISOR can be easily configured to hide any data or analysis not required by the Client. To modify the settings, click on the Analysis Required tab for the Client under the Clients folder, place checkmark next to the Lessons field and click Save.
This is also true for other data functions within ADVISOR including Feasibility Analysis, Development Costs, Hardware Costs, Administrative Costs, Management Costs, Trainees Costs, Instructor Costs, Facilities Costs, Transmission Costs, Support Costs, etc.
The simplest way is to create a Development Cost Templates with zero values and import, whenever you have a need to zero the Development Costs. The concept can also be applied to other Templates as well.